From each of the furniture needs, the chair may be the paramount one. While many other objects (apart from the bed) are intended to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair can be regarded here in the common sense, from stool to throne to further pieces for example a bench or sofa, which may be considered as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as stimulating as its history as art and craft. The chair is not only a physical support and an aesthetic item; it historically was an indicator of social place. From the historical royal courts there were plain connotations between possessing a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but no arms, or worse having to use a stool. From the past century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has been seen as an indicator of superior dignity, and even in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on a high-set floor.
As its furniture purpose, the chair holds a range of different makes. There are chairs manufactured to fit man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and for his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). During past days there were chairs to be born in (birth chairs); during the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. There are chairs that can be folded, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our modern lifestyle has demanded special chairs in automobiles and aircraft. Each and every one of these chair forms have evolved to conform to evolving human needs. Because of its close link with man, the chair comes to its full importance only when in use. Although it makes no difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a chest of drawers if there is anything inside or not, a chair is understood best and tested by a person sitting in it, because chair and sitter require the other. Thus the individual areas of a chair are given labels likened to the areas of the human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the first role of the chair is to support our human body, its worth is valued generally from how well it fulfills this practical role. In the design of the chair, the carpenter is bound in some static laws and principal measurements. Under these limits, however, the chair creator has large freedom.
The history of the chair extended over an epoch of several thousand years. There is evidence of cultures that had distinctive chair forms, as seen of the highest work in the industries of craft and art. Out of those civilisations, a mention should be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lives of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the construct of masterful scheme, were known from tomb discoveries. The first one of these two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair has four legs shaped similar to those of some animal, a curved seat, and a sloping back supported with vertical stretchers. In this design a stable triangular form was crafted. There appeared to be no marked variation between the creation of Egyptian thrones and chairs for common citizens. The real change exists in the decorative ornamentation, in the particulars of expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool probably was developed to be an easily stored seat for army. As a camp stool this stool continued for much later points. But the stool then also was made as the use of a ceremonial seat, its mechanical role as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can from evidence be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are in the form of folding stools but cannot be folded because the seats were created of wood. The simplistic construction of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that cycle on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric held between them, came again somewhat later during the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most well known of this type is the folding stool, made from ashwood, which is now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The iconic Greek chair, the klismos, is seen not with any ancient specimen still around but seen in a trove of pictorial items. The better recognised is the klismos depicted on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial place in outer Athens (c. 410 BC). This klismos is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of those legs are visible. These strange legs were presumed to be executed with bent wood and were probably had huge pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints fastening the legs to the frame of the seat would have been therefore super durable and were plainly signified.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek chair; designs of models of seated Romans are examples of a thicker and apparently slightly less delicately built klismos. Both features, light and heavy, were revived during the Classicist period. The klismos style is evidenced in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in special types of considerable uniqueness of Denmark and Sweden during 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China can not be traced as well as the history of the chair in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed serial of drawings and paintings was protected, showing the interior and outside of Chinese houses and their furniture. Also kept of the 16th century are some chairs constructed from wood or lacquered wood, that display an astonishing resemblance to representations of ancient chairs.
As in Egypt, two fundamental chair forms existed in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. That four-legged chair can be designed both with and without arms but never without the square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to firm the back. In one design, it must be said, the stiles were lightly curved above the arms to sit correctly with the form of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of its back). Together, the three parts were mortised on the yoke-like top rail. Despite that the style of a back splat later had an introduction for English chairs of the Queen Anne period, wooden members that could merely to a limited ability stabilise corner joints (and are loose into the bargain) indicate a signature particular to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which finishes around the rounded staves. Every member is round in section or is given rounded edges—a left over maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and might have had a plaited seat. These chairs needed the sitter to be stiff and upright; if too much weight is placed on the back, the chair has a way of toppling. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this epoch armchairs likely were reserved for elderly family members, for they were given great esteem.
The Chinese folding stool is believed to have travelled to China from the West. It does not differ very much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a dissimilarity in that the top rail is delicately affixed to the two legs of the stool with a curved member, which is more often than not provided with metal mounts. From a Western understanding the resulting effect of these furniture forms is stylized. The constructive and decorative issues are combined in a way that is all at once naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is a result of the fact that the individual members do not seem to have been put together by either glue or screws, but have been mortised into one another and held in its place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also left its name on the chair. Paintings display a kind of chair with a relatively crude wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between the layers, stitched to produce a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after loosening some tiny iron hooks. Thus the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture for traveling which, at the same time, held the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair can be found in engravings of the interior of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Although this style of chair is also made in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won favour, it is not certain that the innovation actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Generally, the legs of the chair will be smooth, round in section, and of slim measurements; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was crafted in impressive numbers, as can be seen from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a row of those chairs lined up against a wall. The style asserts itself by virtue of its harmonious proportions and fine upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of forms—that is, as developed in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and was imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The model owes such popularity to a combination of leisure and charm. The seat suits to the human body and permits a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Normally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions made between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are constructed solidly on craftsmanlike methodology despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof are constructed from wood of fairly thick density; but all the members are deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been taken away, and more expensive chairs may be further embellished with very delicate and decorative carvings. The wood might be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is often used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is in some cases used as an alternative to upholstery.
English chairs from the 18th century were more open in form than the French. The French preference for stylistic uniformity, which disseminated from the most distinguished circles in Paris and Versailles within most of France and was popular in large parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popularised and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper versions of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, indicate that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office furniture in Sydney contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content